netdev - Re: [rfc][patch 3/3] use SLAB_ALIGN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080303201837.GG8974@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 3 Mar 2008 21:18:37 +0100
From:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
To:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [rfc][patch 3/3] use SLAB_ALIGN_SMP

On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 12:12:15PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> > Yeah, that's what I thought too, when I got confused by these new
> > SLUB semantics that you made up. Actually if you look at SLAB,
> > it has very precise and rational semantics. SLUB should respect that.
> 
> These crappy semantics are SLAB semantics that SLUB must support.

They are only crappy in SLUB. In SLAB they are actually useful.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html