netdev - Re: [RFC,PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of netif

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080303.205558.114610030.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:55:58 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	dada1@...mosbay.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of
 netif_rx()

From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:26:17 +0100

> You are absolutly right. We should guard against recursion, using a new field 
> in "pcpu_lstats" (cheap access in a hot cache line as we have to update stats 
> anyway)
 ...
> [PATCH] loopback: calls netif_receive_skb() instead of netif_rx()

I'm willing to seriously entertain this change and stick it
into net-2.6.26 if you will perform a reasonable deep stack
test.

For example, create an XFS filesystem, and mount it NFS over
loopback.  Then stress it like crazy.

See if this generates stack overflows or weird crashes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html