[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080306002205.GI8728@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 16:22:05 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make /proc/net a symlink on /proc/self/net
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 04:59:56PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >>
> >> +static struct net *get_proc_task_net(struct inode *dir)
> >> +{
> >> + struct task_struct *task;
> >> + struct nsproxy *ns;
> >> + struct net *net = NULL;
> >> +
> >> + rcu_read_lock();
> >> + task = get_proc_task(dir);
> >
> > This implies a get_task_struct(), as get_proc_task() invokes get_proc_task()
> > which invokes get_pid_task() which invokes get_task_struct().
> >
> > I don't see the corresponding put_task_struct() -- what am I missing here?
>
> You aren't. However we can easily make this:
> task = pid_task(proc_pid(dir), PIDTYPE_PID);
> And we won't need to increment the count on the task_struct.
That looks like it should do the trick! And the net_get() below
will allow you to safely export the "net" pointer out of an RCU
read-side critical section, so with that change looks good to me!
Thanx, Paul
> Good catch.
>
> >> + if (task != NULL) {
> >> + ns = task_nsproxy(task);
> >> + if (ns != NULL)
> >> + net = get_net(ns->net_ns);
> >> + }
> >> + rcu_read_unlock();
> >> +
> >> + return net;
> >> +}
> >> +
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists