[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080313085245.ad9c2c0b.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:52:45 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
rjw@...k.pl
Subject: Re: netconsole still hangs
On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:09:26 -0700 Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:59:01 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 23:10:53 -0700 (PDT) David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > > Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:57:17 -0700
> > >
> > > > I reran the test on 2.6.24 and all seemed fine: the machine didn't hang and
> > > > stopping the script stopped the netconsole output.
> > >
> > > Can you go back and bisect the tree in one shot to the guilty
> > > commit you found last time, and make sure this test case
> > > works at that point?
> >
> > Plain old
> >
> > git-checkout 33f807ba0d9259e7c75c7a2ce8bd2787e5b540c7 seems to dtrt.
> >
> >
> >
> > git-checkout 33f807ba0d9259e7c75c7a2ce8bd2787e5b540c7
> >
> > Fails very very easily. Basically the machine never successfully boots.
> >
> >
> > git-checkout 0953864160bdd28dfe45fd46fa462b4d2d53cb96
> >
> > Works OK.
> >
> >
> > So yes, I'd say that the revert was not complete.
> >
> >
> > aside: running that while loop just slays the machine. It took 30 seocnds
> > to respond to ^C (across ssh over the same link). There's some severe
> > starvation happening somewhere.
>
>
> The other possible candidates for this are:
>
> commit 0953864160bdd28dfe45fd46fa462b4d2d53cb96
> Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Mon Nov 19 19:23:29 2007 -0800
>
> [NETPOLL]: no need to store local_mac
>
> commit 5106930bd6b57402205e3de54dae9476e215b622
> Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...ux-foundation.org>
> Date: Mon Nov 19 19:18:11 2007 -0800
>
> [NETPOLL]: netpoll_poll() cleanup
Both of those were present in the tree whihc resulted from
git-checkout 0953864160bdd28dfe45fd46fa462b4d2d53cb96
and that tree passed testing.
> What hardware is the problem seen on? Perhaps there is something different
> to look for?
8-way x86_64 with e1000E
2-way x86_64 with e1000E
I previously saw problems with 1-way i386 and a 2-way i386 both with e100
but I haven't retested those since David's revert.
Are the problems not reproducible on your test machines?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists