netdev - Re: [Bug 10238] Re: [PATCH] Re: netconsole still hangs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080318224729.GA2760@ami.dom.local>
Date:	Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:47:29 +0100
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...k.pl,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 10238] Re: [PATCH] Re: netconsole still hangs

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 02:47:42PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:05:42 +0100
> Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com> wrote:
...
> > IMHO, after the below patch to sched.c you can't compare netconsole to
> > 2.6.24 with this sysrq-trigger test; any bugs found with this could be
...
> hm.
...
> So right now it's cannot-reproduce.  I'll try things on the other machine
> this evening.
> 
> I dunno why the sched.c change causes your sysrq-T operation to fail.  Can
> you provide more details please?

...hmm...
Doesn't sysrq-t trigger this sched.c function?

Anyway... My first tests seemed to hang the box with syslog only. Now
I can't repeat it neither with syslog nor netconsole... So, this patch
is a bad hit or it's really about timing.

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html