netdev - Re: drivers/net/niu.c: memcpy(dev->dev_addr, dev->perm_addr, dev->addr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 20 Mar 2008 14:25:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	12o3l@...cali.nl
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: drivers/net/niu.c: memcpy(dev->dev_addr, dev->perm_addr,
 dev->addr_len)?

From: Roel Kluin <12o3l@...cali.nl>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 22:01:02 +0100

> in drivers/net/niu.c, line 6406, 6286 and 7173:
> 
> memcpy(dev->dev_addr, dev->perm_addr, dev->addr_len);
> 
> I noticed that "
> 
> memcpy(dev->perm_addr, dev->dev_addr, dev->addr_len)
> 
> occurs much more often (15x). could it be that the first two arguments
> are swapped in niu.c?

No, these calls are correct.  We are probing the device's permanent
ethernet address, we first place it into dev->dev_addr and then we
copy it into dev->perm_addr.

Please try to actually understand the pieces of strcpy and memcpy code
you are "finding bugs" in before posting to the list as these analysis
on false positives are going to eat up a lot of developer time.

I notice you posting several of these kinds of things.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html