[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080320.170545.77998979.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 17:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jarkao2@...il.com
Cc: jeff@...zik.org, denys@...p.net.lb, hadi@...erus.ca,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH take2][NET] ifb: set separate lockdep classes for queue
locks
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:03:12 +0100
> IMHO it wastes a bit of memory when lockdep is off and adds some
> overhead when lockdep is "partialy" on and doesn't need this, but
> it's really late...
Understood but I really think this is the right way to
implement this.
Patch applied, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists