netdev - [PATCH 0 of 5] IPv6: Fix temporary address support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <patchbomb.1206305168@pirzuine>
Date:	Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:46:08 +0100
From:	Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@...-lyon.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	pekkas@...core.fi, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: [PATCH 0 of 5] IPv6: Fix temporary address support

This is the set of patches I needed to make IPv6 temporary addresses
work in my setup.

First my ISP advertizes 2 prefixes, this was not tested with the current code.
Next one of the prefix has a preferred lifetime of 0, the current code
didn't follow the rfc (no temporary addresses should be created in this case).
Finally the other patch results from my test using a small tmp_preferred_lifetime
and the issues I encountered in this case.

The second patch is probably the most important of the serie and worth applying
to stable, without it I can't use temporary addresses.

Please review and consider applying.

Benoit

PS: I noticed that MAX_DESYNC_FACTOR was used to calculated the preferred
    lifetime, instead of a random number between 0 and MAX_DESYNC_FACTOR. Is
    this on purpose, or should a write a patch ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html