netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/8] New driver "sfc" for Solarstorm SFC4000 controller (try #8)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:58:19 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com,
	jgarzik@...ox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] New driver "sfc" for Solarstorm SFC4000 controller (try #8)

David Miller wrote:
> From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
> Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:54:23 +0000
> 
> > Would you object to our using this test until the default definition exists?
> 
> I'm trying to tell you that you should submit first a
> patch that adds the default definition, as part of
> your patch set.  Instead of papering around this
> problem and waiting for the non-existent "someone else"
> to do the work.

Oh, I'm not waiting.  I have prepared a patch for this.  But it seems
out-of-scope for networking and we'd rather not have the driver blocked
on acceptance of that, so I'll take out the topology check for now.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html