[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080327162156.GA8098@codemonkey.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:21:56 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: bluetooth lockdep trace. (.25rc5-git4)
This came in this morning from a user of a slightly old kernel now, but
I don't see anything obvious post rc5 that would fix this.
Dave
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: =============================================
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: 2.6.25-0.121.rc5.git4.fc9 #1
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: ---------------------------------------------
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: obex-data-serve/3611 is trying to acquire lock:
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){--..}, at: [<f8bd9321>] l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap]
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: but task is already holding lock:
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){--..}, at: [<f8dae136>] rfcomm_sock_connect+0x35/0xc2 [rfcomm]
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: other info that might help us debug this:
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: 2 locks held by obex-data-serve/3611:
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: #0: (sk_lock-AF_BLUETOOTH){--..}, at: [<f8dae136>] rfcomm_sock_connect+0x35/0xc2 [rfcomm]
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: #1: (rfcomm_mutex){--..}, at: [<f8dad337>] rfcomm_dlc_open+0x28/0x294 [rfcomm]
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel:
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: stack backtrace:
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: Pid: 3611, comm: obex-data-serve Not tainted 2.6.25-0.121.rc5.git4.fc9 #1
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [__lock_acquire+2287/3089] __lock_acquire+0x8ef/0xc11
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [sched_clock+8/11] ? sched_clock+0x8/0xb
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [lock_acquire+106/144] lock_acquire+0x6a/0x90
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8bd9321>] ? l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap]
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [lock_sock_nested+182/198] lock_sock_nested+0xb6/0xc6
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8bd9321>] ? l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap]
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [security_socket_post_create+22/27] ? security_socket_post_create+0x16/0x1b
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [__sock_create+388/472] ? __sock_create+0x184/0x1d8
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8bd9321>] l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap]
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [kernel_bind+10/13] kernel_bind+0xa/0xd
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8dad3d7>] rfcomm_dlc_open+0xc8/0x294 [rfcomm]
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [lock_sock_nested+187/198] ? lock_sock_nested+0xbb/0xc6
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8dae18c>] rfcomm_sock_connect+0x8b/0xc2 [rfcomm]
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [sys_connect+96/125] sys_connect+0x60/0x7d
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [__lock_acquire+1370/3089] ? __lock_acquire+0x55a/0xc11
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [sys_socketcall+140/392] sys_socketcall+0x8c/0x188
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: =======================
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists