[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080327.211234.18526256.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:12:34 +0900 (JST)
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: sfr@...b.auug.org.au, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: net build failure
In article <20080327.040502.144245837.davem@...emloft.net> (at Thu, 27 Mar 2008 04:05:02 -0700 (PDT)), David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> says:
> From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:30:06 +0900 (JST)
>
> > How about this?
> > I believe all functions are not used outside the net subsystem.
> >
> > I'm still testing with allmodconfig but
> > at least, allnoconfig works for me.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
>
> Denis has posted a slightly different approach.
>
> I kind of agree with what he is doing, because kobject_uevent
> should not be including any networking headers when CONFIG_NET
> is not set and that causes large portions of the breakage.
>
> What do you think of his 2 patches?
I agree.
Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists