[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080328135338.GA24374@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:53:38 +0800
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
Cc: Matheos Worku <Matheos.Worku@....COM>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, hadi@...erus.ca
Subject: Re: 2.6.24 BUG: soft lockup - CPU#X
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 02:38:45PM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>
> Considering this, I wonder why using this __LINK_STATE_QDISC_RUNNING
> flag to control enqueuing as well would be a wrong idea? Wouldn't this
> enforce pseudo affinity?
Could you elaborate on how you intend to use it to control the
act of enqueueing?
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists