[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080328143959.GT14945@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 11:39:59 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@...nvz.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/11 net-2.6.26] [DCCP]: Replace socket with sock for
reset sending.
Em Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:08:49PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev escreveu:
> Replace dccp_v(4|6)_ctl_socket with sock to unify a code with TCP/ICMP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@...nvz.org>
> ---
> net/dccp/ipv4.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> net/dccp/ipv6.c | 10 ++++++----
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/dccp/ipv4.c b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
> index 4ca8b0c..79a9a4a 100644
> --- a/net/dccp/ipv4.c
> +++ b/net/dccp/ipv4.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> * the Out-of-the-blue (OOTB) packets. A control sock will be created
> * for this socket at the initialization time.
> */
> -static struct socket *dccp_v4_ctl_socket;
> +static struct sock *dccp_v4_ctl_sk;
>
> int dccp_v4_connect(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr *uaddr, int addr_len)
> {
> @@ -514,11 +514,11 @@ static void dccp_v4_ctl_send_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *rxskb)
> if (rxskb->rtable->rt_type != RTN_LOCAL)
> return;
>
> - dst = dccp_v4_route_skb(dccp_v4_ctl_socket->sk, rxskb);
> + dst = dccp_v4_route_skb(dccp_v4_ctl_sk, rxskb);
> if (dst == NULL)
> return;
>
> - skb = dccp_ctl_make_reset(dccp_v4_ctl_socket, rxskb);
> + skb = dccp_ctl_make_reset(dccp_v4_ctl_sk->sk_socket, rxskb);
Why not make dccp_ctl_make_reset receive a struct sock too? It only uses
ctl->sk anyway. But I guess that can be on a follow-up patch, could you
that?
Thanks,
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists