netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/11 net-2.6.26] [DCCP]: dccp_v(4|6)_ctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1206717778.4294.4.camel@iris.sw.ru>
Date:	Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:22:58 +0300
From:	"Denis V. Lunev" <den@...nvz.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/11 net-2.6.26] [DCCP]: dccp_v(4|6)_ctl_socket is
	leaked.

On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:44 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:08:50PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev escreveu:
> > This seems a purism as module can't be unloaded, but though if cleanup method
> > is present it should be correct and clean all staff created.
> 
> Its the right thing to do :-) But perhaps we could have a
> inet_csk_ctl_sock_destroy() as we have inet_csk_ctl_sock_create?
> 
> And since this is not csk at all, could you please rename it to
> inet_ctl_sock_{create,destroy}()? I Agree with Vlad and Pavel that this
> would make it more clear, as SCTP is not (yet) a inet_connection_sock.

Basically, after these sockets will be moved into namespace we'll use
sk_release_kernel for them.

Can I send a rename as a follow up on Monday :) ?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html