[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1206724191.8599.0.camel@iris.sw.ru>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:09:51 +0300
From: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@...nvz.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
containers@...ts.osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/11 net-2.6.26] [DCCP]: dccp_v(4|6)_ctl_socket is
leaked.
On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 13:47 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 06:22:58PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev escreveu:
> > On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 11:44 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:08:50PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev escreveu:
> > > > This seems a purism as module can't be unloaded, but though if cleanup method
> > > > is present it should be correct and clean all staff created.
> > >
> > > Its the right thing to do :-) But perhaps we could have a
> > > inet_csk_ctl_sock_destroy() as we have inet_csk_ctl_sock_create?
> > >
> > > And since this is not csk at all, could you please rename it to
> > > inet_ctl_sock_{create,destroy}()? I Agree with Vlad and Pavel that this
> > > would make it more clear, as SCTP is not (yet) a inet_connection_sock.
> >
> > Basically, after these sockets will be moved into namespace we'll use
> > sk_release_kernel for them.
> >
> > Can I send a rename as a follow up on Monday :) ?
>
> Logically the rename should be done first, then its use, but its up to
> Dave/you.
seems logical. OK, I'll redo this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists