[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.00.0803281925500.5286@penti.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 19:31:01 +0200 (EET)
From: Harald Hannelius <harald@....fi>
To: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>
cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tg3 bad performance, lots of hardware interrupts
On Fri, 28 Mar 2008, Michael Chan wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-03-28 at 15:04 +0200, Harald Hannelius wrote:
>> Phew, I thought that running ethtool -t was like doing stop-A-sync on
>> a
>> Sun. It took almost half an hour to run that ethtool -t command;
>
> Something is very wrong. ethtool -t should only take a few seconds to
> complete. You can try ethtool -t eth0 online to reduce the number of
> tests to see if it makes a difference.
Here's the output of ethtool -t eth2:
The test result is PASS
The test extra info:
nvram test (online) 0
link test (online) 0
register test (offline) 0
memory test (offline) 0
loopback test (offline) 0
interrupt test (offline) 0
I just started a 'ethtool -t eth2 online' and that one took just some 10
seconds or so.
# ethtool -t eth2 online 2>&1 | tee ethtool-output.log
The test result is PASS
The test extra info:
nvram test (online) 0
link test (online) 0
register test (offline) 0
memory test (offline) 0
loopback test (offline) 0
interrupt test (offline) 0
# mpstat 2 2>&1 | tee ethtool2.log
Linux 2.6.24.4 (mauer) 03/28/2008
05:22:42 PM CPU %user %nice %sys %iowait %irq %soft %steal %idle intr/s
05:22:44 PM all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.63 7.56 0.00 80.81 102.99
05:22:46 PM all 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 8.33 4.84 0.00 86.56 123.00
05:22:48 PM all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.03 7.16 0.00 80.80 108.46
05:22:50 PM all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.47 5.23 0.00 84.30 113.93
05:22:52 PM all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.93 10.06 0.00 77.01 135.00
05:22:55 PM all 0.00 0.00 18.11 0.00 24.25 12.62 0.00 45.02 158.28
05:22:57 PM all 0.00 0.00 0.82 0.00 13.11 10.38 0.00 75.68 146.04
05:22:59 PM all 0.00 0.00 0.29 0.00 18.77 12.61 0.00 68.33 136.32
05:23:01 PM all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.64 7.67 0.00 78.69 112.50
05:23:03 PM all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.19 4.86 0.00 85.95 110.50
05:23:05 PM all 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.64 7.67 0.00 78.69 108.00
> How many of these NICs do you have? If you have more than one, do they
> all behave the same way? Have they ever worked well before?
It's a brand spanking new computer, equipped with three of these BCM5751
NICs made by HP. I have ripped out all but one, and I have also tested the
NIC in all three available PCIe slots. Same result.
When all three NIC's where plugged in they didn't work. All three behave
the same one-by-one.
I don't know if they have worked before.
--
A: Top Posters! | s/y Charlotta |
Q: What is the most annoying thing on mailing lists? | FIN-2674 |
http://www.fe83.org/ Finn Express Purjehtijat ry | ============= |
Harald H Hannelius | harald (At) iki (dot) fi | GSM +358 50 594 1020
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists