netdev - Re: Network/block layer race.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:07:36 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	johnpol@....mipt.ru
Cc:	axboe@...nel.dk, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network/block layer race.

From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:56:13 +0300

> Hi.
> 
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 01:40:53PM -0700, David Miller (davem@...emloft.net) wrote:
> > If content protection is desired, higher level things are needed.
> > For example, SAMBA only uses sendfile() if the remote client
> > has an OP lock on the file in question.
> 
> What I propose is to inform sender about when page is transmitted and
> received on the other side via implicit acks, which are provided already
> by tcp, but is not provided to higher layer.
> We can use it for sendfile and thus do not require higher
> layer 'distributed' locks, i.e. sync some state between hosts to inform
> that data was succesfully received. Patch would be minimal, just export
> sock_wfree() and setup different skb destructor if sk_sock_data is
> provided, that will allow for special users (like the same samba) to use
> ->sendpage() path too (with some changes in the code of course, but that
> is worth whole page copying).

I'd have to see the patch, feel free to submit it :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html