netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/4] [SCTP]: "list_for_each()" -> "list_for_each

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080328.163218.258439481.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	vladislav.yasevich@...com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, lksctp-developers@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	rpjday@...shcourse.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] [SCTP]: "list_for_each()" ->
 "list_for_each_entry()" where appropriate.

From: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 10:56:17 -0400

> From: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
> 
> Replacing (almost) all invocations of list_for_each() with
> list_for_each_entry() tightens up the code and allows for the deletion
> of numerous list iterator variables that are no longer necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
> Signed-off-by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@...com>

This is not a "bug fix", it's a huge cleanup and thus not appropriate
for 2.6.x

Please rebuild this patch series without this patch included,
you can submit it for 2.6.26

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html