[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080327.170454.124353224.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:04:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: joe@...ches.com
Cc: ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...hat.com, mpm@...enic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [NET]: uninline skb_put, de-bloats a lot
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:02:37 -0700
> I think this is the sort of change you might have argued
> against accepting without performance testing not long ago.
Look at how complicated the assembler of this function
is. Any inlining performance gains will be trumped by
the instruction cache usage bloat.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists