[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47EDA115.1020200@pobox.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:53:25 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To: Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>
CC: netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6.25-rc6 tulip_read_eeprom fixes for BUG 4420
Grant Grundler wrote:
> Jeff,
> If "location" is > "addr_len" bits, the high bits of location would interfere
> with the READ_CMD sent to the eeprom controller.
>
> A patch was submitted to bug:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4420
>
> which simply truncated the "location", read whatever was in "location
> modulo addr_len", and returned that value. That avoids confusing the
> eeprom but seems like the wrong solution to me.
>
> Correct would be to not read beyond "1 << addr_len" address of the eeprom.
> I am submitting two changes to implement this:
> 1) tulip_read_eeprom will return zero (since we can't return -EINVAL)
> if this is attempted (defensive programming).
> 2) In tulip_core.c, fix the tulip_read_eeprom caller so they don't
> iterate past addr_len bits and make sure the entire tp->eeprom[]
> array is cleared.
>
> I konw we don't strictly need both. I would prefer both in the tree
> since it documents the issue and provides a second "defense" from
> the bug from creeping back in.
>
> thanks,
> grant
>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>
applied, after manually removing "Jeff," and "thanks, grant" lines from
the changelog ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists