[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080328.173414.22278840.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: davej@...emonkey.org.uk
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.25rc7 lockdep trace
From: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:00:13 -0400
> stack backtrace:
> Pid: 2308, comm: NetworkManager Not tainted 2.6.25-0.161.rc7.fc9.i686 #1
> [print_circular_bug_tail+91/102] print_circular_bug_tail+0x5b/0x66
> [print_circular_bug_entry+57/67] ? print_circular_bug_entry+0x39/0x43
> [__lock_acquire+2488/3089] __lock_acquire+0x9b8/0xc11
> [_spin_unlock_irq+34/47] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x22/0x2f
> [lock_acquire+106/144] lock_acquire+0x6a/0x90
> [flush_workqueue+0/133] ? flush_workqueue+0x0/0x85
> [flush_workqueue+68/133] flush_workqueue+0x44/0x85
> [flush_workqueue+0/133] ? flush_workqueue+0x0/0x85
> [flush_scheduled_work+13/15] flush_scheduled_work+0xd/0xf
> [<d096d80a>] tulip_down+0x20/0x1a3 [tulip]
> [trace_hardirqs_on+233/266] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xe9/0x10a
> [dev_deactivate+177/222] ? dev_deactivate+0xb1/0xde
Yes, see for example:
http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg31718.html
You can't flush a workqueue in the device close handler
exactly because of this locking conflict.
Nobody has come up with a suitable way to fix this yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists