netdev - Re: linux-next: Tree for March 29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080330135502.ee27f8a4.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Sun, 30 Mar 2008 13:55:02 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 29

Hi Haavard,

On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 19:12:55 +0100 Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com> wrote:
>
> I see both avr32 builds currently fail, but for different
> reasons...none of which is avr32-specific as far as I can tell.
> 
> defconfig fails with
> 
> drivers/ata/libata-core.c:127: error: 'ata_pci_default_filter' undeclared here (not in a function)
> 
> which seems to be due to CONFIG_ATA && !CONFIG_PCI
> 
> allnoconfig fails with
> 
> include/linux/netdevice.h:843: error: implicit declaration of function 'dev_net'
> 
> which seems to be because the definition of dev_net is inside #ifdef
> CONFIG_NET, while next_net_device, which calls it, is not.

Thanks for tracking these down.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped