[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <47F12F27.802@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 11:36:23 -0700
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
Cc: e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH 6/8] e1000e: convert ndev_ printks to
something smaller
Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Auke Kok wrote:
>> From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
>>
>> The ndev_* printk's are too lenghty and we don't need to specify
>> the adapter/netdev struct at all, making this a lot more readable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h | 27 ++++----
>> drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c | 38 +++++------
>> drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>> drivers/net/e1000e/param.c | 31 +++------
>> 4 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
>
> This stuff should just be removed.
>
> Either the code should be outputting "ethX: blahblah" via printk(), or
> the code should be outputting the standard dev_printk() prefix [driver
> name, PCI device info].
>
> Also, it is recommended to use the NETIF_MSG_xxx bits to permit
> fine-grained control over which messages are output, on a per-port basis
> (controlled via ethtool). grep around for 'msg_enable'
yes and I even tried pushing for a generic netdev printk that incorporates the
msg_enable bits properly
I also got absolutely unwelcome responses to that, if not none :)
once we get such a thing, we can incorporate this into e1000 with this patch by
changing 2 lines. so I think this patch is still a good thing, and it certainly
removes a lot of wrapped lines.
Auke
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists