[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47F180B8.6010801@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:24:24 -0500
From: Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@...dia.com>
To: Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@....de>
CC: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Manfred Spraul <manfred@...orfullife.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, nedev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] forcedeth: mac address fix
Björn Steinbrink wrote:
> On 2008.03.31 16:10:34 -0500, Ayaz Abdulla wrote:
>
>>This critical patch fixes a mac address issue recently introduced. If
>
>
> Does "recently" mean my commit 2e3884b5b16795c03a7bf295797c1b2402885b88?
> If so, I like to be told directly when I break stuff ;-)
>
Thats why I cc'd you. :)
>
>>the device's mac address was in correct order and the flag
>>NVREG_TRANSMITPOLL_MAC_ADDR_REV was set, during nv_remove the flag would
>>get cleared. During next load, the mac address would get reversed
>>because the flag is missing.
>
>
> Hm, but nv_remove also writes back the reversed mac address. I don't see
> how a plain remove/probe cycle would mess things up.
>
>
For example, NVREG_TRANSMITPOLL_MAC_ADDR_REV is set. That would mean
that orig_mac will be stored with correct address. Then you call
nv_remove (via ifdown) which set orig_mac back into the register and
will clear the flag. On the next nv_probe (via ifup), you would perform
the logic to reverse the mac address. But it is still in correct order.
>>As it has been indicated previously, the flag is cleared across a low
>>power transition. Therefore, the driver should set the mac address back
>>into the reversed order when clearing the flag.
>
>
> That's what nv_remove is supposed to do. Is there a case where nv_remove
> is not called?
>
Sorry for the confusion. I was merely stating what needs to be done as
the full solution. This logic was already in place by your patch.
>
>>Also, the driver should set back the flag after a low power transition
>>to protect against kexec command calling nv_probe a second time.
>
>
> Sounds like suspend stopped calling nv_remove? That would make sense
> then. I never checked whether suspend ever actually did call nv_remove
> (I think), but as my patch worked, it basically must have done so, at
> least in the past, right?
>
My understanding is that nv_suspend will call nv_close and then
nv_resume will call nv_open. I don't think nv_probe/nv_remove is called
during the low power transitions.
We want to set back the flag in nv_resume in case kexec is call after
anytime nv_resume is called. Otherwise, nv_probe (via kexec ?) will
think it needs to reverse the address.
> Thanks,
> Björn
>
>
>>Signed-off-by: Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@...dia.com>
>>
>
>>--- old/drivers/net/forcedeth.c 2008-03-31 15:25:05.000000000 -0700
>>+++ new/drivers/net/forcedeth.c 2008-03-31 15:41:51.000000000 -0700
>>@@ -5317,8 +5317,7 @@
>>
>> /* check the workaround bit for correct mac address order */
>> txreg = readl(base + NvRegTransmitPoll);
>>- if ((txreg & NVREG_TRANSMITPOLL_MAC_ADDR_REV) ||
>>- (id->driver_data & DEV_HAS_CORRECT_MACADDR)) {
>>+ if (id->driver_data & DEV_HAS_CORRECT_MACADDR) {
>> /* mac address is already in correct order */
>> dev->dev_addr[0] = (np->orig_mac[0] >> 0) & 0xff;
>> dev->dev_addr[1] = (np->orig_mac[0] >> 8) & 0xff;
>>@@ -5326,6 +5325,22 @@
>> dev->dev_addr[3] = (np->orig_mac[0] >> 24) & 0xff;
>> dev->dev_addr[4] = (np->orig_mac[1] >> 0) & 0xff;
>> dev->dev_addr[5] = (np->orig_mac[1] >> 8) & 0xff;
>>+ } else if (txreg & NVREG_TRANSMITPOLL_MAC_ADDR_REV) {
>>+ /* mac address is already in correct order */
>>+ dev->dev_addr[0] = (np->orig_mac[0] >> 0) & 0xff;
>>+ dev->dev_addr[1] = (np->orig_mac[0] >> 8) & 0xff;
>>+ dev->dev_addr[2] = (np->orig_mac[0] >> 16) & 0xff;
>>+ dev->dev_addr[3] = (np->orig_mac[0] >> 24) & 0xff;
>>+ dev->dev_addr[4] = (np->orig_mac[1] >> 0) & 0xff;
>>+ dev->dev_addr[5] = (np->orig_mac[1] >> 8) & 0xff;
>>+ /*
>>+ * Set orig mac address back to the reversed version.
>>+ * This flag will be cleared during low power transition.
>>+ * Therefore, we should always put back the reversed address.
>>+ */
>>+ np->orig_mac[0] = (dev->dev_addr[5] << 0) + (dev->dev_addr[4] << 8) +
>>+ (dev->dev_addr[3] << 16) + (dev->dev_addr[2] << 24);
>>+ np->orig_mac[1] = (dev->dev_addr[1] << 0) + (dev->dev_addr[0] << 8);
>> } else {
>> /* need to reverse mac address to correct order */
>> dev->dev_addr[0] = (np->orig_mac[1] >> 8) & 0xff;
>>@@ -5596,7 +5611,9 @@
>> static int nv_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>> {
>> struct net_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>+ u8 __iomem *base = get_hwbase(dev);
>> int rc = 0;
>>+ u32 txreg;
>>
>> if (!netif_running(dev))
>> goto out;
>>@@ -5607,6 +5624,11 @@
>> pci_restore_state(pdev);
>> pci_enable_wake(pdev, PCI_D0, 0);
>>
>>+ /* restore mac address reverse flag */
>>+ txreg = readl(base + NvRegTransmitPoll);
>>+ txreg |= NVREG_TRANSMITPOLL_MAC_ADDR_REV;
>>+ writel(txreg, base + NvRegTransmitPoll);
>>+
>> rc = nv_open(dev);
>> out:
>> return rc;
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists