[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080402.092514.75146790.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:25:14 +0900 (JST)
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: benoit.boissinot@...-lyon.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pekkas@...core.fi, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4 of 5] IPv6: fix lifetime calculation on temporary
address creation
In article <20080402001706.GD32592@...zuine> (at Wed, 2 Apr 2008 02:17:06 +0200), Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@...-lyon.org> says:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 08:41:14AM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> > In article <20080401215657.GP475@...zuine> (at Tue, 1 Apr 2008 23:56:57 +0200), Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@...-lyon.org> says:
> >
> > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:04:01PM +0900, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
> > > > In article <ec551b4a5bb25cda00ff.1206305172@...zuine> (at Sun, 23 Mar 2008 21:46:12 +0100), Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@...-lyon.org> says:
> > > >
> > > > > IPv6: fix lifetime calculation on temporary address creation
> > > [snip]
> > > > > + now = jiffies;
> > > > > + elapsed = (now - ifp->tstamp) / HZ;
> > > > > + if (elapsed >= ifp->valid_lft)
> > > > > + tmp_valid_lft = 0;
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + tmp_valid_lft = min_t(__u32,
> > > > > + ifp->valid_lft - elapsed,
> > > > > + idev->cnf.temp_valid_lft);
> > > > > + if (elapsed >= ifp->prefered_lft)
> > > > > + tmp_prefered_lft = 0;
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + tmp_prefered_lft = min_t(__u32,
> > > > > + ifp->prefered_lft - elapsed,
> > > > > + idev->cnf.temp_prefered_lft - desync_factor / HZ);
> > > >
> > > > Basically I agree, but it is possible to expire the temporary
> > > > address AFTER public address, which is not good. Please fix this.
> > >
> > > do you mean because of the rounding of 'elapsed' ? otherwise I don't see
> > > what the problem is, sorry.
> >
> > Right. Maybe we could substruct "now" by adj = (now - ifp->tstamp) % HZ;
> > now = jiffies
> > elapsed = (now - ifp->tstamp) / HZ;
> > now -= (now - ifp->tstamp) % HZ;
>
> Why not just simply round it above:
> elapsed = (now - ifp->tstamp + HZ - 1) / HZ; /* round it up */
> and the rest stays the same.
>
> Or do we care about having a lifetime a little bit (<1s) shorter ?
Yes, I do.
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists