netdev - Re: [PATCH] cxgb3: Fix __must

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <47F34ECC.7040905@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 02 Apr 2008 05:15:56 -0400
From:	Chris Snook <csnook@...hat.com>
To:	Dan Noe <dpn@...merica.net>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cxgb3: Fix __must_check warning.

Dan Noe wrote:
> Fix the warning:
> drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_main.c: In function ‘offload_open’:
> drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_main.c:936: warning: ignoring return value of ‘sysfs_create_group’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result
> 
> Now the return value is checked; if sysfs_create_group() returns failure,
> a warning is printed, and the code continues as before.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dan Noe <dpn@...merica.net>
> ---
>  drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_main.c |    3 ++-
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> My first patch - feedback is appreciated, please be gentle.  Thanks!
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_main.c b/drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_main.c
> index fd2e05b..3007fe1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/cxgb3/cxgb3_main.c
> @@ -1015,7 +1015,8 @@ static int offload_open(struct net_device *dev)
>  	init_smt(adapter);
>  
>  	/* Never mind if the next step fails */
> -	sysfs_create_group(&tdev->lldev->dev.kobj, &offload_attr_group);
> +	if (sysfs_create_group(&tdev->lldev->dev.kobj, &offload_attr_group))
> +		printk(KERN_WARNING DRV_NAME ": cannot create sysfs group\n");

Two things:

1) You've obsoleted the preceding comment, so you might as well remove it.

2) The original author quite explicitly didn't think this was worth a 
printk.  printk calls expand the kernel binary, which has a cost, so we 
shouldn't be adding printk calls *just* to shut up a build warning. 
Personally, I think this is the sort of thing I might like to know about 
if I were debugging something, so it might make sense to make it a 
dev_dbg.  When DEBUG is not set, no printk gets compiled in, so the 
binary stays lean, but you can still get the message if you compile with 
DEBUG enabled.

-- Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html