[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8496f91a0804020250o35e08732ya68e799550e074fa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2008 13:50:17 +0400
From: "Matvejchikov Ilya" <matvejchikov@...il.com>
To: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC][LAPB] write_queue limit in lapb_data_request
> > LAPB doesn't check for write_queue length in lapb_data_request(). So
> > in some conditions it may grow unlimited. There is a potential problem
> > for small systems.
> >
> > It seems like this for me:
>
> It doesn't enforce limits on any of it's queued from what
> I can tell.
I'm sorry. It's not quiet clear to me what you mean. As far as I know
LAPB internals there is only one place where write_queue may increase.
In other cases the ack_queue is used.
>
> Without a thorough audit of resource limit enforcement in
> this protocol stack, changing things here might be more
> trouble than it's worth.
>
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists