[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47FA2543.1080609@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:44:35 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: lists@...yfurniss.entadsl.com
CC: Corey Hickey <bugfood-ml@...ooh.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [NET_SCHED 00/04]: External SFQ classifiers/flow classifier
Andy Furniss wrote:
> Andy Furniss wrote:
>> Andy Furniss wrote:
>>
>>> Looking at the sfq code it seems that enqueue doesn't init/zero allot
>>> for a new flow unless it's the first and most of what I see fits with
>>> this.
>>
>>> But rarely it doesn't look like that's all there is to it.
>>
>> Actually it fits perfectly, so that is all there is to it. Dequeue
>> dequeues first then checks allot so even if the allot is stuck at
>> -20345 or something the flow will still get 1 packet per round which
>> is what I've seen. I first thought it should have moved towards 0 like
>> it does when it starts too high.
>
> Seems like this change fixes it for me, though I since noticed that
> requeue will need the same change as well.
>
> --- sch_sfq.c.orig 2008-04-07 11:42:36.000000000 +0100
> +++ sch_sfq.c 2008-04-07 11:46:41.000000000 +0100
> @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@
> q->next[x] = q->next[q->tail];
> q->next[q->tail] = x;
> q->tail = x;
> + q->allot[x] = 0;
That might fix the symptom, but I don't think its correct.
As I said, you can't simply reset to zero since it might cause
unfairness of bursty flows against non-bursty flows.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists