netdev - Re: [patch] NET: remove support for Davicom 9102 from the Tulip driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.SOC.4.64.0804071726210.29033@math.ut.ee>
Date:	Mon, 7 Apr 2008 17:28:03 +0300 (EEST)
From:	Meelis Roos <mroos@...ux.ee>
To:	Grant Grundler <grundler@...isc-linux.org>
cc:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, cebbert@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] NET: remove support for Davicom 9102 from the Tulip
 driver

> jeff and davem already answered the basic SROM/MAC address issue.
> Patches to fix this are associated with
> 	http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9106

> >> I happent to have a Sun Fire V100 with 2 Davicom NICs (1282:9102 (rev 
> >> 31)).
> >> tulip driver works for them, dmfe doesn't.
> 
> This experience doesn't agree with the bug report.
> Meelis, can you please take a look at the bug report and add comments?

Comments added.

> We tried (b) but didn't get it working on V100 previously.
> Several patches are attached to the bug report.

There was one patch (for getting the MAC from OpenFirmware) but as 
people reported that the Tx timeouts still happen, I didn't try it. Any 
reason to try?

-- 
Meelis Roos (mroos@...ux.ee)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html