[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47FB2FF3.90104@openvz.org>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 12:42:27 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
CC: Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6.26 2/2] Do not allocate unneeded memory for dev->priv
alignment.
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> Pavel Emelyanov wrote, On 04/07/2008 06:31 PM:
> ...
>
>> ---
>> net/core/dev.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>> index 7aa0112..80e103a 100644
>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>> @@ -4000,7 +4000,8 @@ struct net_device *alloc_netdev_mq(int sizeof_priv, const char *name,
>> alloc_size = (sizeof(*dev) + NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST +
>> (sizeof(struct net_device_subqueue) * (queue_count - 1))) &
>> ~NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST;
>> - alloc_size += sizeof_priv + NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST;
>> + if (sizeof_priv)
>> + alloc_size += sizeof_priv + NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST;
>>
>> p = kzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
>> if (!p) {
>
>
> IMHO this second "+ NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST" is needed here because of "~NETDEV_ALIGN_CONST".
Hmm, AFAIC, the net_device alignment is done earlier, while this one
makes sense in case the priv pointer alignment.
> Regards,
> Jarek P.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists