netdev - Re: RE: A Linux TCP SACK Question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804082024410.23237@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date:	Tue, 8 Apr 2008 20:26:36 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	Wenji Wu <wenji@...l.gov>
cc:	'Sangtae Ha' <sangtae.ha@...il.com>,
	'John Heffner' <johnwheffner@...il.com>,
	'Netdev' <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RE: A Linux TCP SACK Question

On Tue, 8 Apr 2008, Wenji Wu wrote:

>  
> > It's a bit hard for me to believe, considering what the last weeks 
> > debug 
> > has revealed about internals of it. Have you checked it from the dumps 
> > or 
> > from the overall results, a similarity in the latter could be due to 
> > other factors related to the differences in reordering detection 
> > between 
> > NewReno/SACK.
> > 
>
> Get back to you later, and post the tcpdump file for 2.6.25. 

Please, if possible use a kernel version where my today applied tcp fixes 
are in, ie., at least DaveM's net-2.6 already has them, I didn't check if 
Linus has pulled them in yet.

-- 
 i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html