[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080409113321.GK12774@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:33:21 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@....mipt.ru>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [take 2] Fix for the fundamental network/block layer race in sendfile().
On Wed, Apr 09 2008, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 09:26:52PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov (johnpol@....mipt.ru) wrote:
> > > Unless I mistaken, you store in page->lru.next some info to find
> > > your pipe pointer, assuming it is unique for this page.
> > >
> > > What happens if two threads are doing a splice()/sendfile() using the
> > > same underlying (source) file (and same pages in this file)
> >
> > Page will be referenced twice (for each thread) and each thread will
> > have own pipe_inode_info structure, so each one will sleep on own wait
> > queue and will be awakened separately, where its release counter will be
> > dropped.
>
> I was wrong, here will be a problem - page can be shared between multiple
> threads, since it is unlocked after putting it into page cache, so it is
> not allowed to put into it some per-thread private data.
Threads or not, it does not matter. Even simpler, the same page could be
in multiple pipes. So that trick definitely will not work at all.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists