[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47FD5CBC.6040905@trash.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 02:18:04 +0200
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To: Kazunori MIYAZAWA <kazunori@...azawa.org>
CC: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, pupilla@...mail.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [XFRM]: xfrm_user: fix selector family initialization
Kazunori MIYAZAWA wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
>> From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>> Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:38:55 +0200
>>
>>> [XFRM]: xfrm_user: fix selector family initialization
>>> Commit df9dcb45 ([IPSEC]: Fix inter address family IPsec
>>> tunnel handling)
>>> broke openswan by removing the selector initialization for tunnel
>>> mode
>>> in case it is uninitialized.
>>> This patch restores the initialization, fixing openswan, but
>>> probably
>>> breaking inter-family tunnels again (unknown since the patch author
>>> disappeared). The correct thing for inter-family tunnels is probably
>>> to simply initialize the selector family explicitly.
>>> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
>>
>> I've applied this to net-2.6, thanks Patrick.
>>
>> Once we resolve how to get inter-family working without
>> breaking existing setups, we can put better logic back
>> in here. But for now the regression is more important.
>
> Sorry, I missed the thread.
> I have no idea to solve the regression.
Wouldn't explicitly initializing the SA family for
inter-family tunnels work?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists