netdev - bnx2 probe order change from 2.6.21 -> 2.6.24

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080410154401.GA14486@linuxace.com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Apr 2008 08:44:01 -0700
From:	Phil Oester <kernel@...uxace.com>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mchan@...adcom.com
Subject: bnx2 probe order change from 2.6.21 -> 2.6.24

Apologies if this has been covered already, but I searched the archives and
couldn't find anything.

I recently upgraded a Dell Poweredge 1950 from 2.6.21 to 2.6.24, and found
that the onboard Broadcom NetXtreme II nics got probed in the reverse order.

2.6.21:

Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v1.5.8.1 (May 7, 2007)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:04:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
eth8: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B1) PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz found at mem f8000000, IRQ 16, node addr 0015c5eaef1c
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:08:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
eth9: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B1) PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz found at mem f4000000, IRQ 16, node addr 0015c5eaef1e

2.6.24:

Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v1.6.9 (December 8, 2007)
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:08:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
eth8: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B1) PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz found at mem f4000000, IRQ 16, node addr 00:15:c5:ea:ef:1e
ACPI: PCI Interrupt 0000:04:00.0[A] -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
udev: renamed network interface eth8 to eth9
eth8: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B1) PCI-X 64-bit 133MHz found at mem f8000000, IRQ 16, node addr 00:15:c5:ea:ef:1c


Is this known/expected?  Seems somewhat odd from both a MAC address
perspective (1c < 1e) and a PCI bus order (04 < 08).  Thoughts?

Phil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html