netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/14 (3 subsets)] Make tuns and vlans devices work per-net.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080411.111131.132418112.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	xemul@...nvz.org
Cc:	dlezcano@...ibm.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, den@...nvz.org,
	containers@...ts.osdl.org, benjamin.thery@...l.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/14 (3 subsets)] Make tuns and vlans devices work
 per-net.

From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:57:25 +0400

> I think, that core kernel code and protocols should/may use the struct 
> net, while modules are better to work via generic pointers. However, if
> the generic pointers cause noticeable performance degradation, then we
> may ask Dave to bear with on-net members :)

This sounds fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html