[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080413082738.GA2788@ami.dom.local>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 10:27:38 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
isdn4linux@...tserv.isdn4linux.de, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [NET] [ISDN]: Do not validate ISDN net device address
prior to interface-up
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:05:08AM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
...
> In my opinion a proper error code like EADDRNOTAVAIL is enough, we
> have thousands of checks that might make things fail, should we
> add a printk to every one of those?
IMHO yes - but only when "the functionality" is changed causing
regressions like this. BTW, I've assisted some similar case in
bugzilla, and I guess users will still ask for an explanation after
this error code change.
Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists