lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:58:16 -0500 From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org> To: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com> Cc: avorontsov@...mvista.com, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup On Apr 14, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Timur Tabi wrote: > Kumar Gala wrote: > >> I say leave as you have it (UCC1 == cell-index = <1>). >> >> Changing it so cell-index = <0> is just more confusing w/regards to >> the docs. > > I don't see anything in booting-without-of.txt that requires cell- > index to start > at 0, however, the only other device that starts at 1 is SATA. Even > the SSI > starts at 0: > > - cell-index : the SSI, <0> = SSI1, <1> = SSI2, and so on > > Although I don't want to make more work for Anton, my vote is to > have cell-index > start at 0. That is the convention. It's too late to fix SATA, but > at least we > can avoid making it worse. I use cell-index starting at 1 for PCI to match our docs. I'll take Anton's last patch. - k -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists