netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <DFDD56A6-BDA5-40CA-9F85-032330B0ACDD@kernel.crashing.org>
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2008 09:58:16 -0500
From:	Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
Cc:	avorontsov@...mvista.com, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [POWERPC] UCC nodes cleanup


On Apr 14, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>> I say leave as you have it (UCC1 == cell-index = <1>).
>>
>> Changing it so cell-index = <0> is just more confusing w/regards to
>> the docs.
>
> I don't see anything in booting-without-of.txt that requires cell- 
> index to start
> at 0, however, the only other device that starts at 1 is SATA.  Even  
> the SSI
> starts at 0:
>
>       - cell-index	  : the SSI, <0> = SSI1, <1> = SSI2, and so on
>
> Although I don't want to make more work for Anton, my vote is to  
> have cell-index
> start at 0.  That is the convention.  It's too late to fix SATA, but  
> at least we
> can avoid making it worse.

I use cell-index starting at 1 for PCI to match our docs.

I'll take Anton's last patch.

- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html