netdev - Re: bugreport: The r8169.c driver is calling netif_receive

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4803A144.3030300@linux.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:24:04 -0700
From:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
CC:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
	NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: bugreport: The r8169.c driver is calling netif_receive_skb from
 hardirq and with interrupts off

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:01:16 -0700
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> The r8169.c driver is calling netif_receive_skb from hardirq and with interrupts off,
>> which seems to be invalid (the comments of netif_receive_skb) certainly say so.
>>
>> The calltrace is like this:
>>
>> packet_rcv
>> netif_receive_skb
>> rtl8168_rx_interrupt
>> rtl8168_interrupt
>> handle_IRQ_event
>> handle_fasteoi_irq
>> do_IRQ
>>
>>
>> Which triggers a warning in packet_rcv() since that does a local_bh_enable(),
>> which gives a WARN_ON if irqs are disabled (rightfully so it seems).
>>
>> The code looks is in rtl8169_rx_interrupt() line 2832 and looks like
>>
>>                          if (rtl8169_rx_vlan_skb(tp, desc, skb) < 0)
>>                                  rtl8169_rx_skb(skb);
>>
>> with
>> #define rtl8169_rx_skb                  netif_receive_skb
>> higher up in the file.
>>
>> This is the 46th highest ranking warnon/oops report for 2.6.25-rc
>>
> 
> rtl8169_rx_skb is defined as netif_receive_skb only if NAPI is enabled.
> But the backtrace has CONFIG_R8169_NAPI disabled.

what makes you think this config option is disabled ?
(just curious)

> I also concerned that the reset_task calls rx_interrupt with different locking
> than normal interrupt. 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html