[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1208271789.20681.45.camel@FWR-FLAB>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:03:09 +0200
From: Filip Aben <f.aben@...ion.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@...tonika.lt>,
ajb@...eresystems.co.uk
Subject: Re: [RFC] Patch to option HSO driver to the kernel
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 16:14 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 15. April 2008 16:12:22 schrieb Filip Aben:
> >
> > On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 15:25 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > Am Montag, 14. April 2008 23:32:39 schrieb Greg KH:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > Here's a patch that I have cleaned up for context only from Option that
> > > > is a USB serial / network device all in one.
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to see this go into 2.6.26, so any review comments by anyone
> > > > who wishes to review any portion of this would be greatly apprecited.
> > >
> > > The driver implements an ioctl to disable autosuspend. This seems
> > > unnecessary to me, as you can do that via sysfs, too. Is this included
> > > to work around permission problems? Can somebody explain?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Oliver
> >
> > This is added to support card firmware upgraders who will need to
> > disable suspend, even on (embedded) systems that don't have sysfs
> > mounted.
>
> How do they enable autosuspend without sysfs?
Good point. No idea. I suppose it's easier to rely on something that
will always work, rather then making assumptions about suspend based on
whether sysfs is mounted or not.
( Wasn't there a kernel recently that had autosuspend enabled by
default ? )
Regards,
Filip-
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists