netdev - Re: RE: A Linux TCP SACK Question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:08:45 +0300 (EEST)
From:	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To:	John Heffner <johnwheffner@...il.com>
cc:	Wenji Wu <wenji@...l.gov>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RE: A Linux TCP SACK Question

On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, John Heffner wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Wenji Wu <wenji@...l.gov> wrote:
> >  SlowStart            0
> >  CongAvoid            0
> >  CongestionSignals    3
> >  OtherReductions      13166
> >  X_OtherReductionsCV  0
> >  X_OtherReductionsCM  13166
> >  CongestionOverCount  37
> >  CurCwnd              10136
> >
> > MaxCwnd              173760
> >  CurSsthresh          94894680
> >  LimCwnd              4294965848
> >  MaxSsthresh          94894680
> >  MinSsthresh          46336
> 
> 
> We can see that in both cases you are getting throttled by
> tcp_moderate_cwnd (X_OtherReductionsCM).  I'm not sure offhand why
> it's reaching this code - I would have thought that the high
> tp->reordering would prevent this.  Ilpo, do you have any insights?

What makes you think so? It's called from tcp_try_to_open as anyone can 
read from the source, basically when our state is CA_Disorder (some very 
small portion might happen in ca_recovery besides that).


-- 
 i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html