[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0804152005110.27927@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:08:45 +0300 (EEST)
From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi>
To: John Heffner <johnwheffner@...il.com>
cc: Wenji Wu <wenji@...l.gov>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RE: A Linux TCP SACK Question
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008, John Heffner wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Wenji Wu <wenji@...l.gov> wrote:
> > SlowStart 0
> > CongAvoid 0
> > CongestionSignals 3
> > OtherReductions 13166
> > X_OtherReductionsCV 0
> > X_OtherReductionsCM 13166
> > CongestionOverCount 37
> > CurCwnd 10136
> >
> > MaxCwnd 173760
> > CurSsthresh 94894680
> > LimCwnd 4294965848
> > MaxSsthresh 94894680
> > MinSsthresh 46336
>
>
> We can see that in both cases you are getting throttled by
> tcp_moderate_cwnd (X_OtherReductionsCM). I'm not sure offhand why
> it's reaching this code - I would have thought that the high
> tp->reordering would prevent this. Ilpo, do you have any insights?
What makes you think so? It's called from tcp_try_to_open as anyone can
read from the source, basically when our state is CA_Disorder (some very
small portion might happen in ca_recovery besides that).
--
i.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists