netdev - question on rfkill

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200804161017.04844.oliver@neukum.org>
Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:17:02 +0200
From:	Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, IvDoorn@...il.com
Subject: question on rfkill_suspend

Hi,

it seems like rfkill does not guarantee that it won't talk to suspended
devices. Is that true? Should request that arrive for suspended devices
be ignored or postponed?

	Regards
		Oliver

#ifdef CONFIG_PM
static int rfkill_suspend(struct device *dev, pm_message_t state)
{
	struct rfkill *rfkill = to_rfkill(dev);

	if (dev->power.power_state.event != state.event) {
		if (state.event & PM_EVENT_SLEEP) {
			mutex_lock(&rfkill->mutex);

			if (rfkill->state == RFKILL_STATE_ON)
				rfkill->toggle_radio(rfkill->data,
						     RFKILL_STATE_OFF);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html