lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080416.013810.214799502.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 16 Apr 2008 01:38:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	bkostya@...mail.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netif_needs_gso behavior

From: Kostya B <bkostya@...mail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:52:20 +0000

> Please help me to understand why != CHECKSUM_PARTIAL packet requires gso? In the case of TCP it is ok, however UDP could be normally unchecked.

What exactly is the problem?  The UDP USO output paths set
CHECKSUM_PARTIAL just like the TCP TSO ones do, so the test will pass
for them.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ