[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <B9622B0A-92E6-4787-8C5E-F54982F10556@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 08:26:12 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>
Cc: <avorontsov@...mvista.com>, "Wood Scott" <scottwood@...escale.com>,
<linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>, "Jeff Garzik" <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
"Tabi Timur" <timur@...escale.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][POWERPC] qe_lib and ucc_geth: switch to the cpm_muram implementation
On Apr 16, 2008, at 10:38 PM, Li Yang wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+leoli=freescale.com@...abs.org
>> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+leoli=freescale.com@...abs.org]
>> On Behalf Of Anton Vorontsov
>> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 2:22 AM
>> To: Kumar Gala
>> Cc: Wood Scott; linuxppc-dev@...abs.org; Jeff Garzik; Tabi
>> Timur; netdev@...r.kernel.org
>> Subject: [PATCH v2][POWERPC] qe_lib and ucc_geth: switch to
>> the cpm_muramimplementation
>>
>> This is very trivial patch. We're transitioning to the
>> cpm_muram_* calls. That's it.
>
> Hi Anoton,
>
> It is a good thing to unify the CPM dpram operation and QE muram
> operation. But I'm having concerns about the naming as CPM is an
> obsolete block. Can we change to use the new name QE instead?
or at least provide both names by a simple:
#define qe_muram_addr cpm_muram_addr
- k
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists