lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 17 Apr 2008 21:09:33 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <>
To:	David Newall <>
Cc:	Jesper Juhl <>,,, linux-kernel <>,
	James Morris <>,
	Al Viro <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	Willy Tarreau <>,,
	Stephen Clark <>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <>,
	Tilman Schmidt <>,,
	Mark Lord <>, David Miller <>,,,
Subject: Re: Reporting bugs and bisection

On Thursday, 17 of April 2008, David Newall wrote:
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > Interresting. Just be careful results are produced for the big picture
> > and not used to point fingers at individuals.
> >   
> If there are individuals at whom a finger needs to be pointed, this
> system will highlight them, and fingers will (and should) be pointed. 
> Contributors of poor-quality code need to be weeded-out.

Define poor quality.
> Finger-pointing, in these extreme cases, gives incentive to improve
> quality.  It's a positive thing.

Sorry, but I have to disagree.  Negative finger-pointing is never a good thing.
Also, it doesn't give any incentive to anyone.  It only makes people feel bad
and finally discourages them from contributing anything.

If you want to give poeple incentives, reward them for doing things you'd like
them to do.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists