netdev - Re: [bug] build failure in net/netfilter/nf_conntrack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080419.041119.143183732.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 19 Apr 2008 04:11:19 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jengelh@...putergmbh.de
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kaber@...sh.net,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [bug] build failure in net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_sip.c, on
 latest -git

From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:44:53 +0200 (CEST)

> 
> On Saturday 2008-04-19 12:07, David Miller wrote:
> >Patrick, is this how we should do it?
> >
> > config NF_CONNTRACK_SIP
> > 	tristate "SIP protocol support"
> >-	depends on NF_CONNTRACK
> >+	depends on NF_CONNTRACK && NF_NAT
> > 	default m if NETFILTER_ADVANCED=n
> 
> Not really. One may want to run a system without NAT,
> but still with connection tracking (for firewalling) -- think IPv6.

But SIP needs the NAT layer in order to get at those
expectation structure members.

What is your alternative fix suggestion then?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html