netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/5] /dev/vring: simple userspace-kernel ringbuffer interface.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8793.1208617324@vena.lwn.net>
Date:	Sat, 19 Apr 2008 09:02:04 -0600
From:	corbet@....net (Jonathan Corbet)
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] /dev/vring: simple userspace-kernel ringbuffer interface. 

> So I think it would be good to plonk the proposed interface on the table
> and have a poke at it.  Is it compat-safe?  Is it extensible in a
> backward-compatible fashion?  Are there future-safe changes we should make
> to it?  Can Michael Kerrisk understand, review and document it?  etc.
> 
> You know what I'm saying ;)  What is the proposed interface?

So, I'm not Michael, but I *did* make an attempt to document this
interface - user and kernel sides - so that it could be more easily
understood:

	http://lwn.net/Articles/276856/

That was the previous posting, but a quick look suggests it hasn't
changed *that* much in this round.

jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html