netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/3] [TC/U32] Infrastructure for pretty printing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <480C96D3.5050809@trash.net>
Date:	Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:29:55 +0200
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	hadi@...erus.ca
CC:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] [TC/U32] Infrastructure for pretty printing

jamal wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-21-04 at 13:52 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> 
>> So far the dump output can be cut-and-pasted and is
>> properly parsed again (useful for example for deletion).
>> Does that still work with pretty printing?
> 
> great idea;-> 
> It doesnt do that at the moment - all it tries to do is be equivalent to
> the raw format (example the prefix "match" etc).
> I think it is worth it though to try what you suggest and i will look
> into it and provide an additional patch on top.
> IINMistaken you are thinking of a save/restore feature?

Something like that. But it used to already work the
way I described, at least for all parts where I tested
it so far (IIRC routes/rules/addresses/qdiscs/classes/filters).

> The main challenge would be the cruft that dumps at the begining i.e the
> sort of:
> --
> filter protocol ip pref 10 u32
> filter protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 802: ht divisor 1
> filter protocol ip pref 10 u32 fh 802::800 order 2048 key ht 802 bkt 0
> flowid 1:12
> ---

Yes, the first part needs to be stripped (filter/qdisc/class/...).
I usually do something like

"ip link/route/addr del <paste dump without first word here>".

Similar for tc.

> I am wondering in the case of -c if we should also go all the way and
> dump just sufficient info to be able to reuse it as is to re-insert or
> alternatively dump as it is today (for the lines above) and the restore
> script would extract enough details out of the above.
> Thoughts?


It would be nice to dump it in a format that can be piped
into batch mode without further changes, so it would have
to insert "add" between "filter" and "protocol".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html