netdev - Re: [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 1/1]: Queuing policies -- reworked version of Tomasz's patch set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080422.150648.158484938.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:06:48 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	tomasz@...belny.oswiecenia.net
Cc:	kaber@...sh.net, acme@...hat.com, gerrit@....abdn.ac.uk,
	dccp@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [DCCP] [RFC] [Patchv2 1/1]: Queuing policies -- reworked
 version of Tomasz's patch set

From: Tomasz Grobelny <tomasz@...belny.oswiecenia.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 22:45:53 +0200

> Maybe I wasn't clear enough with my question. I understand that
> these two memsets would have to be readded. But my question is: did
> you identify any bugs that were caused by junk in skb->cb before
> applying your patch? If so, do you have any test cases? It could
> help to check code for correctness if one day more space in skb->cb
> will be needed (which of course doesn't have to be in the nearest
> future).

I think Patrick noticed it because it broke netfilter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html