netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH resend]: Fix output for BEET ipsec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200804231013.38390.joakim.koskela@hiit.fi>
Date:	Wed, 23 Apr 2008 10:13:38 +0300
From:	Joakim Koskela <joakim.koskela@...t.fi>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH resend]: Fix output for BEET ipsec

On Tuesday 22 April 2008 16:13, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 03:12:40PM +0300, Joakim Koskela wrote:
> > Thanks, but I'm still having problems with 6-6 and the interfamilies.
> >
> > Here's what I'm using right now to get net-2.6 beet working (testing with
> > older versions and another implementation). It's basically the same as I
> > sent before, slightly updated (to use the protocol-independent
> > accessors).
>
> You know it would really help if you told us what problems you're
> having rather than just resending the patch over and over again :)

Sorry, I know really should. I'll try to get back on this asap with some more 
details. But in a nutshell - I get crashes on 4-6 (inner-outer), and although 
6-4 gets packets on the wire, they're somehow wrong. Hm, don't actually think 
there's anything wrong with 6-6 though, I'll have to recheck that.. 

Cheers, 
j
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html