[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080424.211953.52921169.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 21:19:53 +0900 (JST)
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
<yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: ellre923@...il.com, wangchen@...fujitsu.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RAW6: Do not allow set IPV6_CHECKSUM for ICMPv6 socket
In article <20080424.034845.137470754.davem@...emloft.net> (at Thu, 24 Apr 2008 03:48:45 -0700 (PDT)), David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> says:
> From: "chen wang" <ellre923@...il.com>
> Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2008 18:42:14 +0800
>
> > 2008/4/20, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>:
> > > RFC3542 tells that IPV6_CHECKSUM socket option in the IPPROTO_IPV6
> >
> >
> >
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > Where in RFC3542 says that "only IPPROTO_IPV6 level" is not allowed to be
> > set
> > IPV6_CHECKSUM option on ICMPv6 socket?
>
> Yoshifuji-san, please address this question.
>
> I haven't applied this patch, and I won't until this is resolved
> and discussed.
RFC3542 discusses about IPPROTO_IPV6 level IPV6_CHECKSUM socket option only.
IPPROTO_RAW level IPV6_CHECKSUM socket option is undocumented Linux
extension. So, we are free to choose allowing setting that option on
ICMPv6 socket as we have been doing.
--yoshfuji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists